THE ABSURD TIMES
Illustration: Alan Derschowitz criticized Israel for not allowing Chomsky through. He is therefore either 1)anti-semetic or 2) a self-hating Jew. His reasons were that 1) it made Israel look rediculous and 2) Chomsky is an ineffective speaker. Chomsky has published over 100 books and has an extremely demanding speaking schedule as he is much in demand. Apparently, audiences are tired of effective speakers.
Apartheid Israel, Bunker Israel: Elvis Costello and Noam Chomsky
Posted on May 19, 2010 by Juan
The repercussions of the brutal shooting-fish-in-a-barrel Gaza War, of the continued Israeli siege and boycott of the Gaza Strip, and of the vigorous colonization of the Palestinian West Bank by militant Israelis, continue to grow. The clear resistance of the far rightwing government of Binyamin Netanyahu to the two-state solution sought urgently by US president Barack Obama, in favor the massive and ongoing theft of Palestinian land and resources, has increasingly tarred Israel with the brush of Apartheid policies. The greatest danger facing Israel is no longer, as in the past, neighboring Arab armies, tank corps and missiles. It is a series of humiliations in the realm of cultural politics, most of them self-inflicted.
The arts community is often pioneers in symbolically protesting human rights violations that others find it inconvenient to mention. Artists are independent-minded and often financially independent, and so cannot easily be pressured.
Thus, singer Elvis Costello’s decision to join Carlos Santana, Sting, Gil Scott Heron, and Bono in boycotting Israel is likely a harbinger of things to come rather than being just an individual decision of conscience. Costello announced at his web page that:
‘ It is after considerable contemplation that I have lately arrived at the decision that I must withdraw from the two performances scheduled in Israel on the 30th of June and the 1st of July.
One lives in hope that music is more than mere noise, filling up idle time, whether intending to elate or lament.
Then there are occasions when merely having your name added to a concert schedule may be interpreted as a political act that resonates more than anything that might be sung and it may be assumed that one has no mind for the suffering of the innocent.
I must believe that the audience for the coming concerts would have contained many people who question the policies of their government on settlement and deplore conditions that visit intimidation, humiliation or much worse on Palestinian civilians in the name of national security. ‘
If some world cultural figures will not go to Israel anymore, increasingly irrational and Draconian Israeli restrictions on dissidents have excluded from Israel Jewish-American linguist and activist Noam Chomsky.
Chomsky was told that the Israeli government did not like his writings and that it objected to him speaking at Bir Zeit University in the West Bank but not in Israel proper. He accused Israel of acting like a totalitarian state.
Ironies abound here. The Likud government has by this action legitimated academic boycotts, a political technique that the British Left in particular has advocated be used against Israel itself. Those who argued against boycotting Israel earlier were able to say that it upheld academic freedom and exchange and so should not be isolated. Chomsky himself pointed out that Israel was in essence boycotting Bir Zeit University in preventing his appearance there.
(Another important point is that Israel was making this decision for occupied Palestinians. The latter have no voice in the matter, since they cannot vote for the Israeli government that rules them and decides whose lectures they may attend).
Another irony is that Chomsky could not get official confirmation that he would be permitted to enter the West Bank on a second try, and so he addressed his Bir Zeit audience by video from Amman, with Aljazeera helping out. In the region, Aljazeera has played an important role in giving a platform to a very wide range of political views, and now this Arab media outlet is more open than the supposedly democratic Israel.
The stories of Elvis Costello and Noam Chomsky illuminate two over-arching processes. Israel’s growing reputation as an Apartheid state will not result in major economic boycotts in the near term. But the step Costello took may become more and more common if the Palestinians continue to be deprived by Israel of their basic human rights. Chomsky’s story is one of self-imposed isolation on the part of Israeli officials, mired in the proto-fascist political philosophy of Vladimir Jabotinsky– the intellectual background of the Likud Party and of Netanyahu.
This entry was posted in Israel/ Palestine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.
← Kabul Blast Kills 19, Wounds 52; 5 US Troops Dead
Angry Tea Partiers are not the Moral Equivalent of Compassionate Democrats →
8 Responses to Apartheid Israel, Bunker Israel: Elvis Costello and Noam Chomsky
- Cide Hamete Benengeli says:
May 19, 2010 at 2:43 am
Here is a revealing statement from Ehud Olmert in 2003:
“More and more Palestinians are uninterested in a negotiated, two-state solution, because they want to change the essence of the conflict from an Algerian paradigm to a South African one. From a struggle against `occupation,’ in their parlance, to a struggle for one-man-one-vote. That is, of course, a much cleaner struggle, a much more popular struggle – and ultimately a much more powerful one.”
Evidently, even the Israeli leadership agrees that they are running an Apartheid state.
- peter says:
May 19, 2010 at 6:26 am
according to the BBC, Chomsky’s reaction to the Israelis’ statement that they didn’t like his writings, was “I asked them if they could find any government in the world that likes the things I say.”
- Kathleen Galt says:
May 19, 2010 at 10:52 am
Prof Cole did you watch the
Senate Foreign Relations Cmte. Hearing on START Treaty (May 18, 2010)
Senate Foreign Relations Cmte. Hearing on START Treaty In April, Pres. Obama and Russian Pres. Medvedev signed a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) that will limit long-range nuclear weapons. Sec. of State Clinton, Defense Sec. Gates and Jt. Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mullen discussed the treaty at a Senate Foreign Relations Cmte hearing. This would replace the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the 2002 Moscow Treaty.
Washington, DC : 2 hr. 16 min.
Hillary “warmongering” Clinton claimed some things about Iran that I hope you dissect. She said that Iran IS enriching uranium above 20%. She was also saying that she had China and Russia on board for more sanctions.
Have you noticed all of the energy commercials on the MSM? First they have a Iraqi Vet talking about how the US needs to get off the oil teat in the middle east, show US tanks being blown up by IED’s, then they show a shot of the Iranian President and call him a MADMAN and how our oil addiction puts money in his pocket. Several versions of these commercials but they are being played all over the MSM. MSNBC, CNN etc.
New strategy to fuel aggression towards Iran
- Pingback: May 19, 2010 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
- citizen says:
May 19, 2010 at 10:00 pm
Good for Elvis Costello, Santana, Sting, Gil Scott Heron, and Bono!
I too would like to boycott Israeli products on a personal basis. I am not sure there are a lot of consumer products being sold in this country that are from Israel. I assume most are industrial products and services sold to industries rather than to consumers. Does anyone know about organization or websites that inform consumers on this issue? Thanks.
- DBake says:
May 20, 2010 at 2:08 am
Dr. Cole (or readers),
Are there any books on the intellectual history of Likud and Jabotinsky’s political philosophy you would recommend? I had read about fascist influence before, but I don’t know the details.